|
|
Post by Lord of Hordes on Feb 27, 2007 12:27:45 GMT -5
WTH?  ?? i dont understand at all, if its false its false and even more falser   In Soviet Russia, your post is in direct violation of the rules of doom.  I'd fucking LOVE to do that to SCAKK, and see what he says.... SCAKK: "Your post is in direct violation of the Rules of Doom...etc etc...." Me: "In Soviet Russia, your rules of doom are in direct violation of this post!" |
|
|
|
Post by Piccolo on Feb 27, 2007 12:39:47 GMT -5
rofl, do it next time he does that:P
|
|
|
|
Post by The Hot Popcorn on Feb 27, 2007 17:55:53 GMT -5
but when he says that the thread is locked already
|
|
|
|
Post by Piccolo on Feb 27, 2007 20:32:33 GMT -5
alrighty then, I'm gonna PM SCANK that:P
|
|
|
|
Post by Piccolo on Feb 27, 2007 20:41:38 GMT -5
ok, gonna go take a shower, when I get back, I'll post the links to the screenshots of me sending SCANK the message:P   |
|
|
|
Post by RobertM on Feb 27, 2007 21:14:08 GMT -5
I can't wait.
|
|
|
|
Post by blazedragon555 on Feb 27, 2007 22:01:00 GMT -5
Neither can I. I want to see the consquences...  |
|
|
|
Post by 123prince on Feb 28, 2007 6:23:27 GMT -5
OMGZZZ!!!!!! LOL!!!!!! SO!!!!!!! FUNNYY!!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by jatrix on Feb 28, 2007 6:26:33 GMT -5
Answer false... It's true. Which means it's false. Which means it is true.
Answer true... it's false then. That means it's true. Whic means it's false.
etc.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lord of Hordes on Feb 28, 2007 11:00:44 GMT -5
Rules to successful logic:
1. Nothing can be both "true" and "false". It is impossible.
2. A question, that only questions itself, cannot be answered without relevant subjectivity. It is impossible.
3. Circular reasoning (true = false = true = false) is not logical and retains zero stability in a logical discussion. If you find yourself in a conundrum of circular reasoning, the correct response is most likely NOT an option.
Notes:
Rule #1...if something is "true", then it's true. If something is "false", then it's false...they are opposites, and cannot be the same thing...EVER. That's like saying the color gray is BOTH black AND white...no, it's not...it is gray, which is a combination of black and white, but, still it is NEITHER black nor white.
Rule #2....relevant subject matter is REQUIRED in order to know what a statement is about. Without that knowledge, a question regarding a statement is impossible to answer correctly.
Rule #3.... circular reasoning is illogical. A good example would be like asking "Are you alive or do you exist?", and then answering by saying "I exist, because I'm alive, and I'm alive because I exist". Circular reasoning is moot to all logical discussion.
|
|
?? i dont understand at all, if its false its false and even more falser
